|
The structure
of the mexican energy sector
The Mexican energy sector is structured as shown in Figure
1. The Energy Secretariat coordinates the sector; it is organized
in three large areas.
The oil & gas subsector has as its main
organization the state own company PETROLEOS MEXICANOS (PEMEX),
which is composed
of five subsidiaries: PEMEX Exploración and Producción
(PEP), PEMEX Refinación (PR), PEMEX Gas y Petroquímica
Básica (PGPB), PEMEX Petroquímica (PP), and PEMEX
International (PMI). The Instituto Mexicano del Petróleo
(IMP), also a public entity, offers technical support to PEMEX.
Besides these public entities, according to the Natural Gas
Regulation published in 1995, an important number of private
companies participate in the gas transport, its distribution
and the re-gasification of imported liquid natural gas.
The electricity subsector has as its principal utility, Comisión
Federal de Electricidad (CFE), which generates and transmits
close to 100% of the electricity in the country, and distributes
approximately 75% of the kWh sold. Luz y Fuerza del Centro
(LyFC), also a public utility, basically distributes the other
25%% of the kWh, mainly in the center of the country. According
to the 1992 revision of the Public Service Law of Electricity,
at present there are several private companies that generate
electricity for CFE (Independent Power Producers – IPP);
it also allows the import and export of electricity by this
type of companies. The Instituto de Investigaciones Eléctricas
(IIE) offers technical support to CFE, LyFC, as well as PEMEX
and other public and private industry, in the area of electricity.
Also, there are another three entities in the central government
that regulate or/and promote different aspects of the energy
sector. The Comisión Reguladora de Energía (CRE),
the Comisión Nacional de Seguridad Nuclear y Salvaguardias
(CNSNS), and the Comisión Nacional de Ahorro de Energía
(CONAE). There is also the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones
Nucleares (ININ), which carries out research and development
activities in the area of the peaceful applications of nuclear
energy.
Figure 1. Energy Sector of Mexico

The energy balance
The energy balance of the country is summarized in Table
1.
One of its main features is the strong dependency of the economy
on the oil&gas resources (92%), including the oil exports.
On the other hand, in relation to final consumption, the transport
sector is the largest consuming sector (42%, excluding the
energy sector). This percentage is more important than that
of the industrial sector which is only 29%.
Table 1. Energy Balance
2005
Primary
Energy Production (PJ)
|
Final
Consumption(PJ)
|
| Nuclear
energy |
117.880
|
Transport |
1,864.360
|
Wind Energy
|
0.050
|
Agriculture & Cattle |
122.515
|
Geothermal Energy
|
73.604
|
Industrial |
1,253.535
|
Hidroenergy
|
278.434
|
Residential, commercial,
and public sector |
842.182
|
Coal
|
215.998
|
Non energy uses |
306.573
|
Crude oil
|
6,702.647
|
TOTAL: |
|
Condensates
|
183.670
|
|
|
Natural Gas
|
2,478.386
|
|
|
Sugar Cane Bagasse
|
103.780
|
|
|
| Non Commercial
Wood |
247.216
|
|
|
TOTAL:
|
10,401.665
|
|
|
| Energy not used: |
80.0
|
Exports –Imports:
|
2,897.6
|
Inventory Variations:
|
12.9
|
Transformation Losses:
|
1,518.5
|
Statistical Differences:
|
2.2
|
Processing Agreements:
|
45.9
|
Energy Sector Consumption,
and
Transport and Distribution Losses:
|
1,455.2
|
TOTAL
|
6,012.3
|
Reference: Balance
Nacional de Energía 2005. Secretaría de Energía.
Renewable energies, as shown in Table 2, have played a complementary
role in the last few years to the production of primary energy.
The variations that are observed are due to the variability
of the climatic conditions that affect the electricity production
in large hydroelectric units.
Table 2. The Renewable Primary Energies in the Energy
Balance of Mexico (PetaJoules)
| |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
| Hydroenergy |
271.153
|
252.956
|
336.146
|
344.220
|
291.822
|
259.054 |
205.049
|
254.391
|
278.43
|
| Firewood |
246.088 |
243.913 |
249.517 |
253.868 |
255.844 |
255.087 |
256.742 |
258.411 |
247.21 |
| Sugar Cane Bagasse |
95.971
|
99.277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Geoenergy |
56.075
|
58.132
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Wind |
0.041
|
0.051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
669.328
|
654.329
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Produced |
9,354.6 |
9,515.5
|
9,314.5
|
9,661.3
|
9,734.5
|
9,624.9
|
10,064.339
|
10,330.74
|
9.819.71 |
% |
7.15 |
6.87 |
7.89 |
7.73 |
7.16 |
6.84 |
6.09 |
6.50 |
7.15 |
Reserves and production of primary
energy
In Table 3,
the various reserves and productions of the primary energies
used in the energy
mix are presented, including the parameter reserves/production
ratio (R/P) for non-renewable energy resources which indicates
the number of years that the reserves will last at the actual
rate of production of that specific energy resource.
Table 3.
Reserves and Production of Primary Energies in Mexico
| |
1998
|
2005
|
| |
Reserves
|
Production
|
R/P
|
Reserves
|
Production
|
R/P
|
Crude oil(1)
|
40.38 x
109 b
|
3.07 X 106
b/d
|
36.0
|
33.09 X 109*
|
3.33 X 106 b/d |
27.5 |
Natural gas(1)
|
60.47 x
1012 pc |
4.74 X 109
pc/d
|
34.9
|
68.42 X 1012 pc |
4.81 X 109 pc/d |
38.9 |
Coal
|
663 x 106 ton
|
11.5 x 106 ton
|
57.6
|
663 X 106 ton |
12.5 X 106 ton |
53 |
| Hydroenergy |
80 TWh/a |
24.62
TWh/a
|
--- |
80 TWh/a |
17.2 TWh/a
|
|
Geothermal
energy
|
10.4 TWh/a |
5.62 TWh/a
|
--- |
10.4 TWh/a
|
6.8 TWh/a |
|
| Uranium |
10,600 m Ton |
--- |
--- |
10,600 m Ton |
--- |
|
* Proven
reserves are only 11.83 billion barrels
References:
- Anuario
Estadístico Pemex 2006.
- Compendio de información del Sector Energético. Reporte Interno.
Programa Universitario de Energía. UNAM.
Between 1985 and 2005, significant changes took place in the
oil sector; partially as a result of the reduction in investment
for exploration activities, the reserves to production ratio,
R/P, diminished significantly. If only the proven reserves
are taken into consideration (11.83 x 109 barrels), the 2005
R/P is only 9.7 years. This parameter seems to be low as compared
to the older one: yet it really is not. It is not efficient
from the economic point of view to invest indefinitely a large
amount of financial resources in exploration to increment its
value, since they become non-productive resources. What is
important to ascertain is to maintain along a certain period
of time the R/P value within an adequate range determined by
the financial requirements of the company, as reserves are
looked upon as collateral guaranty. This is done incorporating
new reserves to replace those oil barrels produced in the year.
The large oil&gas private companies keep R/P values in
the range of 10 to 15.
Production and infrastructure
of the oil&gas sector
From Table 4, one observes that the refining capacity has
been constant in the last eight years. Important increases
are shown in the processes related to the naphta conversion
and hydrodesulphurization, which generate less polluting fuels.
Table 4. Refining Capacity
(thousand of
barrels per day)
| |
1998
|
2005
|
| Atmospheric Distillation |
1,525.0
|
1,540.0
|
Vacuum Distillation
|
757.1
|
768
|
| Cracking
|
368.0
|
375
|
Visbreaking
|
141.0
|
141
|
Naftas Reforming
|
226.0
|
301
|
Hydrodesulfurization1
|
748.0
|
987
|
| Natural Gas Liquids
Fractionation |
---
|
---
|
1 Does
not include the Cangrejera refinery
References:
- La Refinación en México. Ing. Gerardo
Bazán Navarrete. Reporte Interno, Programa Universitario
de Energía, UNAM, mayo 2006.
- Anuario Estadístico Pemex 2006. In Table 5, the production values of the three main fuels
- gasoline, diesel and fuel oil – are shown comparing
1998 with 2005. Gasoline production has increased by 10% and
diesel production by 9.6%. Fuel oil production has been reduced
due to the initiation of the revamp process of the six refineries
which includes the installation of coke production, thus reducing
the fuel oil production capacity. The increase in gasoline
production was not enough to satisfy the increase in demand,
resulting in imports of this fuel; in 2005, it was equivalent
to 33% of the demand.
Table 5.
Crude Oil Products
(thousand barrels per day)
| |
1998
|
2005
|
| Gasolines |
412
|
455 |
Diesel
|
290
|
318 |
Fuel oil
|
446
|
351 |
References:
- Informe
Estadístico de
Labores Pemex 2005
- Anuario Estadístico 2006 Pemex
In Table 6, the oil&gas pipeline transport
infrastructure of PEMEX up to 2004 is shown; it reflects the
important investment that has been made in the past.
Table 6.
Hydrocarbon Transport Infrastructure (kilometers)
| |
Pemex
Exploración
y Producción
|
Pemex
Refinación |
Pemex
Petroquímica
Básica |
Pemex
Petroquímica |
| Crude oil |
4,441
|
4,706
|
---
|
--- |
Natural gas
|
7,312
|
---
|
9,016
|
--- |
Oil products
|
---
|
8,814
|
3,051
|
1,071 |
Total: |
11,753 |
13,520 |
12,067 |
1,071 |
References:
- Informe Estadístico de Labores Pemex 2005
- Anuario Estadístico 2006 Pemex
Generation and infrastructure
of the electricity sector
In Table 7, the installed capacity and the electricity generation
in Mexico is shown. As observed for 2005, fossil fuels (coal,
natural gas, oil products) dominate in the installed capacity
(72% ) as well as in the generation (79%). Between 1998 and
2005, the expansion of the installed capacity was based on
natural gas combined cycle technology, which is also reflected
in the electricity generation. In the area of renewable energies,
the increase is mainly due to an increase in the hydroelectric
generation and a slight increase in the utilization of geothermal
resources.
Table 7. Electricity Generation and
Installed Capacity [ GWh y (MWe)]
| |
1998
|
2004
|
2005
|
Hidroenergy
|
24,616
|
(9,700)
|
25,076
|
(10,530)
|
27,611
|
(10,536)
|
| Fossil fuels |
|
| ° Fuel
oil / Natural Gas |
86,206
|
(14,283)
|
66,334
|
(13,983)
|
65,077
|
(12,965)
|
| ° Coal |
17,957
|
(2,600)
|
17,883
|
(2,600)
|
18,380
|
(2,600)
|
| ° Coal/fuel
oil |
12,692
|
(2,100)
|
7,915
|
(2,100)
|
14,275
|
(2,100)
|
| ° Combined
cycle |
13,184
|
(2,463)
|
72,267
|
(12,041)
|
73,381
|
(13,255)
|
| ° Gas turbines |
1,087
|
(1,929)
|
2,772
|
(2,818)
|
1,358
|
(2,598)
|
° Diesel
Int. Combustion
|
314
|
(120)
|
610
|
(153)
|
780
|
(153)
|
| Nuclear energy |
9,265
|
(1,309)
|
9,194
|
(1,365)
|
10,805
|
(1,365)
|
Geothermal energy
|
5,657
|
(750)
|
6,577
|
(960)
|
7,299
|
(960)
|
Wind
|
5
|
(2)
|
6
|
(2)
|
5
|
(2)
|
Total:
|
170,983
|
(35,256)
|
208,634
|
(46,552)
|
218,971
|
(46,534)
|
Note: This table
does not include generation by private permit holders in the
following categories: self-supply, co-generation, and export,
which in 2004 was 26,966 GWh (generation as allowed in the permits,
not the real generation)..
Reference: Prospectiva
Sector Eléctrico 2006-2015. SENER As for the transmission and distribution capacity, Table
8 shows that the first has significant changes (28%) between
1998 and 2005, most of it carried out by CFE. As for the increase
in capacity for Luz y Fuerza del Centro (LyFC), apparently
it is mainly in the area of distribution.
Table 8.
Electric Infrastructure in Transmission and Distribution (kilometers)
| |
1998
|
2005
|
Transmission
CFE
(161-400 kV)
|
32,997 |
45,766 |
Subtransmission
CFE (69-138 kV)
|
38,225
|
45,598 |
Distribution-CFE
(<34.5kV)
|
523,493
|
597,056 |
LyFC
(total)
|
28,003 |
71,132 |
TOTAL: |
622,718 |
759,552 |
Reference: Prospectiva
Sector Eléctrico
2006-2015. SENER
Outlook to 2015
In Table 9, the projected additions in capacity for the electrical
sector are shown. Although there is a modest increase of hydroelectric
capacity, the increase is mainly due in technologies related
to the utilization of fossil fuels; fuel oil utilization will
decrease, but natural gas increases dramatically. Of the projected
additional installed capacity, 5,279 MWe have no specific technology
attached to them. It would be highly desirable that these could
be based on alternate fuels to fossil fuels, in order to diversify
the overall energy mix as well as reduce the emission of greenhouse
gases.
Table 9.
Electrical Sector Installed Capacity Projections to 2015
(MWe)
| |
2005
|
2015
|
| Hidroenergy |
10,536
|
13,679 |
| Fuel
oil/Natural gas |
12,965
|
7,240 |
| Coal |
2,600
|
4,678 |
| Coal/Fuel
oil |
2,100
|
2,100 |
| Combined
cycle |
13,255
|
27,327 |
| Gas
Turbines |
2,598
|
2,436 |
| Diesel
Internal combustion |
153
|
239 |
| Nuclear energy |
1,365
|
1,365 |
| Geothermal energy |
960
|
1,043 |
| Wind |
2
|
592 |
| Not specified |
0 |
5,279 |
TOTAL:
|
46,534 |
65,978 |
Reference: Prospectiva
Sector Eléctrico 2006-2015. SENER
In Table 10, the projections for the natural gas subsector
are presented. A substantial increment in its use is observed,
with 25% of the required supply corresponding to imports. Approximately
8% of these are expected to occur in gaseous form, which implies
transport by pipeline from the USA, where all the known projections
indicate that this country will have a deficit in its supply/demand
balance, as its local production is on a continuous decline.
Table 10. Natural Gas Balance to 2015.
Base Demand and Medium Supply
(millions of cubic feet per day)
Supply |
2005 |
2015 |
|
Demand |
2005 |
2015 |
Pemex Production
|
5,046
|
6,639
|
|
Pemex |
2,833
|
3,250
|
Imports
|
905 |
2,198*
|
|
Industrial
sector |
935 |
1,331 |
TOTAL:
|
5,951
|
8,837
|
|
Electric
sector |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Public |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Private |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Domestic
y Service sectors |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Transport
sector
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Inventory |
36 |
---
|
| |
|
|
|
TOTAL: |
5,927 |
8,662 |
* As
LNG in 2015: 1,500 millions of cubic feet per day.
Reference: Prospectiva
Sector Eléctrico 2006-2015. SENER
The data on Table 11 shows the expected production
and imports of oil products. The local production of gasoline
and diesel
will increase substantially in the next ten years. Local production
will be the main source. Gasoline imports will decrease and
diesel imports will disappear.
Table 11.Oil Products and Imports
(thousand barrels per day)
| |
1998 |
2005 |
2015 |
| GASOLINES |
Production
|
411.3
|
439.5
|
796.5
|
Imports
|
137.5 |
231.8
|
191.3
|
TOTAL |
548.8 |
671.3 |
987.8 |
DIESEL
|
Production
|
290.0
|
318.2
|
484.0 |
Imports
|
19.4
|
24.8
|
--- |
TOTAL |
309.4 |
343.0 |
484.0 |
References:
-
La Refinación en México. Ing.
Gerardo Bazán Navarrete. Reporte Interno.
- Programa Universitario de Energía, UNAM, Mayo 2006.
- Anuario Estadístico Pemex 2006.
- Prospectiva de Petrolíferos 2006-2015, SENER.
The increase in nominal capacity for refining processes corresponding
to the same period, 2006 to 2015, are presented in Table
12.
Table 12. Nominal Incremental Capacity
in Refining Processes 2006 - 2015
(thousand barrels per day)
Process Units
|
Minatitlán |
Salamanca |
Salina Cruz |
Tula |
New
refinery |
TOTAL |
Atmospheric Distillation
|
150.0
|
0.0
|
165.0
|
0.0
|
300.0
|
615.0
|
Craking
|
42.0
|
28.0 |
30.0 |
43.0 |
117.0
|
260.0 |
Visbreaking
|
0.0
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
0.0
|
0.0 |
Reforming
|
0.0
|
14.0 |
10.0 |
9.0 |
32.0 |
65.0 |
Alquilación e Isomerization1
|
26.0 |
25.0 |
23.0 |
22.0 |
65.0 |
161.0 |
Hydrodesulfurization
|
101.0
|
72.0 |
90.0 |
71.0 |
313.0 |
647.0
|
Coquización
|
56.0
|
45.0 |
92.0 |
57.0 |
140.0 |
390.0
|
| Azufre2 |
0.0 |
200.0 |
800.0 |
200.0 |
900.0 |
2,100.0 |
1 Production Capacity, 2 Ton/day
References:
- IMP con base en información Pemex Refinación.
- La Refinación en México. Ing. Gerardo Bazán Navarrete,
PUE-UNAM,
mayo 2006.
- Prospectiva de Petrolíferos, 2006-2015, SENER.
Prepared by:
Gerardo Bazán PUE-UNAM and Pablo Mulás IIE
07/03/07
|